| Re: How would you define Macro?
Again, thanks BR, I have used a Nikon 4500 for quite a few years and it does do what you say, and I think it will always be my carry everywhere camera. I like it so much that I recently bought a second one, in case the first one goes pop (price was about .25 of the first one I bought). now I have bought a Pentax 200D and added the lens I mentioned, it is rather intimidating me. I have decided to define what I am doing as either going for a walk (take the Nikon), or going out to take photos (take DSLR). The only problem is, I can't make decisions, so I take both, and the digital video, and the binoculars, and the tripod, and the monopod, and the spotting scope, and Grandfathers Ross Ensign 1/4 plate film camera, and the telescope, and the prismatic compass, and the brass-bound insect proof chest. And I can't carry them more than 5 metres, 'cos we are surveying, so you have the Lumpy Devil, then we are putting in new dip-wells, so there is the auger, the dipwells, the covers...
If I said I could go on, is there anyone here who could doubt it?
Think I will take the Nikon.  |