View Single Post

  #23 (permalink)  
Old 17-03-2008, 01:59 PM
eeyore's Avatar
eeyore eeyore is offline
Knight Grand Cross of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: i'm right here
Posts: 11,154
Re: carbon or carbon dioxide ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by pressld2 View Post
You need to burn them to free the atoms from the molecules that they are currently in. A lump of coal is pretty inert and does not give off CO2 on it's own.

I takes ridiculously high temperatures to burn a diamond but yes, it too would produce CO2 if you did.

Dave P.
another really big outputter of Co2 is the manufacture of cement - the underlying issue being that you have to cause carbon to react with oxygen - or cause a carbon containing molecule to react with oxygen (in this case calcium carbonate (CaCo3) - being reduced to calcium oxide then calcium hydroxide. You dont necessarily have to "burn" anything for this to happen.
__________________
Some people are like slinkies, good for nowt, but they make you smile when pushed down stairs
Reply With Quote