View Single Post

  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2008, 06:30 PM
wildlifesnapper's Avatar
wildlifesnapper wildlifesnapper is offline
Commander of the Wild Empire
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.E. Derbyshire
Posts: 2,039
Re: Sigma 70-200mm f2.8

Hi

personally if I had the 100-300 F4 then I don't think I would bother getting the 70-200 f 2.8. The two lenses are so close zoom wise and there is only one stop difference between the two, not really worth paying £600 for.I'd just up the ASA for the rare occasions that I would want to use f 2.8 instead of f4.

neil
__________________
www.neilhardwick.zenfolio.com
Reply With Quote